<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Midwife Responds to the Hastings Indian Medical Center VBAC Ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbacfacts.com/2008/04/12/a-midwife-responds-to-the-hastings-indian-medical-center-vbac-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/04/12/a-midwife-responds-to-the-hastings-indian-medical-center-vbac-ban/</link>
	<description>Vaginal birth after cesarean?  Don&#039;t freak, know the facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCPCS Codes On Line Search &#187; Blog Archive &#187; medical codes [2008-04-12 16:12:20]</title>
		<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/04/12/a-midwife-responds-to-the-hastings-indian-medical-center-vbac-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>HCPCS Codes On Line Search &#187; Blog Archive &#187; medical codes [2008-04-12 16:12:20]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbacfacts.com/2008/04/12/a-midwife-responds-to-the-hastings-indian-medical-center-vbac-ban/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...]  A Midwife Responds to the Hastings Indian Medical Center VBAC Ban  By Jennifer  This recommendation was based on a poorly done study of discharge diagnosis codes that actually demonstrated the same statistics on uterine rupture as previous studies of VBAC, but the authors came to very different conclusions &#8230;   VBAC Facts - http://vbacfacts.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  A Midwife Responds to the Hastings Indian Medical Center VBAC Ban  By Jennifer  This recommendation was based on a poorly done study of discharge diagnosis codes that actually demonstrated the same statistics on uterine rupture as previous studies of VBAC, but the authors came to very different conclusions &#8230;   VBAC Facts &#8211; <a href="http://vbacfacts.com" rel="nofollow">http://vbacfacts.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

