<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VBAC Facts &#187; South Dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbacfacts.com/category/region/south-dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbacfacts.com</link>
	<description>Vaginal birth after cesarean?  Don&#039;t freak, know the facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The cost of getting your medical records</title>
		<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/06/09/the-cost-of-getting-your-medical-records/</link>
		<comments>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/06/09/the-cost-of-getting-your-medical-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jen Kamel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesarean section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virigina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbacfacts.com/2008/06/09/the-cost-of-getting-your-medical-records/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s always enlightening to get a copy of your medical records, specifically the records related to your child&#8217;s vaginal birth/cesarean section.&#160; Often, women who are told that they needed a cesarean because their baby was in distress, find that the medical records do not reflect that diagnosis.&#160; Moms frequently find that the &#8220;valid medical reason&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always enlightening to get a copy of your medical records, specifically the records related to your child&#8217;s vaginal birth/cesarean section.&nbsp; Often, women who are told that they needed a cesarean because their baby was in distress, find that the medical records do not reflect that diagnosis.&nbsp; Moms frequently find that the &#8220;valid medical reason&#8221; they were given is absent from their medical record and in its place is &#8220;maternal request,&#8221; &#8220;elective,&#8221; or &#8220;consent upon consultation.&#8221;&nbsp; Where is the valid medical reason?&nbsp; Frequently, it&#8217;s not present in the record simply because it didn&#8217;t exist.&nbsp; As we have seen, doctors attempt to coerce women into repeat cesareans based on their <a href="http://vbacfacts.com/2008/05/22/vbacing-against-the-odds/">schedules</a> and instilling &#8220;<a href="http://vbacfacts.com/2008/06/03/hospital-vbac-turned-cs-due-to-constant-scare-tactics/">big baby fear</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take the time to get and read your records.&nbsp; You may find that your &#8220;emergency&#8221; cesarean was no rush at all.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lamblawoffice.com/medical-records-copying-charges.html">Medical Records Copying Charges by State</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/06/09/the-cost-of-getting-your-medical-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physician Credential Verification by State</title>
		<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/05/08/physician-credential-verification-by-state/</link>
		<comments>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/05/08/physician-credential-verification-by-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jen Kamel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virigina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbacfacts.com/2008/05/08/physician-credential-verification-by-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know if your doctor has been subject to a board hearing or disciplinary note?&#160; 
Here is a link to the State Board sites for all 50 states.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Want to know if your doctor has been subject to a board hearing or disciplinary note?&nbsp; </p>
<p>Here is a <a href="http://www.noah-health.org/en/usmd/state.html">link</a> to the State Board sites for all 50 states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/05/08/physician-credential-verification-by-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Dakota Homebirth Midwifery</title>
		<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/18/south-dakota-homebirth-midwifery/</link>
		<comments>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/18/south-dakota-homebirth-midwifery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jen Kamel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwifery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/18/south-dakota-homebirth-midwifery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Black Hills Today, great news for women in South Dakota!
&#34;After years of waiting, South Dakota families now have an option for out of hospital births.&#160; Today, Governor Rounds signed into law a bill that allows South Dakota Certified Nurse Midwives to attend births without a previously required collaborative agreement if they are providing care [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.blackhillsportal.com/anps/anitem.cfm?annid=1084" target="_blank">Black Hills Today</a>, great news for women in South Dakota!</p>
<p>&quot;After years of waiting, South Dakota families now have an option for out of hospital births.&#160; Today, Governor Rounds signed into law a bill that allows South Dakota Certified Nurse Midwives to attend births without a previously required collaborative agreement if they are providing care outside of the hospital.&#160; </p>
<p>South Dakota&#8217;s Nurse Midwives praised the Govenor, Legislators and the South Dakota Department of Health Secretary, Doneen Hollingsworth, for fighting for families who desire home birth care with qualified providers.&#160;&#160; &quot;It is a huge step in the right direction for low risk families who desire alternatives for their birthing experience&quot; says Sue Rooks, a certified nurse midwife from Oral, SD.&#160; &quot;It is great news.&quot;&#160; Rooks is the Chairperson of the South Dakota Chapter of the American College of Nurse Midwives, ACNM, the professional organization that provides the credential for nurse midwives.</p>
<p>In anticipation of Senate Bill 34s passage, one CNM, <a href="http://www.blackhillsportal.com/cdps/cditem.cfm?nid=9826" target="_blank">Jeanne Prentice</a> has been working toward establishing a homebirth practice in the Northern Hills.&#160; Prentice already practices in Wyoming just one mile across the border in Beulah where she provides prenatal care to those in Wyoming who choose out of hospital births but is licensed in South Dakota as well.&#160; Prentice has been unable to provide out of hospital care to South Dakota women because of a law that required her to have a signed agreement with a physician as a pre-requisit to practice.&#160; Senate Bill 34 removes this requirement for nurse midwives who are providing care in &quot;certain circumstances&quot; &#8211; homebirths.&#160;&#160; <br />The new law goes into effect on July 1st.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/18/south-dakota-homebirth-midwifery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midwifery Legislative Update aka Making homebirth legal in more states</title>
		<link>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/08/midwifery-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/08/midwifery-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jen Kamel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home birth/HBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwifery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBs and midwives who support VBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/08/midwifery-legislative-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently found a fantastic website called The Mommy Blawg that chronicles the intersection of mommyhood and the law.&#160; Her latest post discusses recent midwifery legislation in Alabama, Idaho, Maryland, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, and South Dakota.
She links to another great website: &#8220;The Big Push For Midwives, launched on January 24, is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently found a fantastic website called <a href="http://mommyblawg.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">The Mommy Blawg</a> that chronicles the intersection of mommyhood and the law.&nbsp; Her latest <a href="http://mommyblawg.blogspot.com/2008/02/midwifery-legislative-updates.html" target="_blank">post</a> discusses recent midwifery legislation in Alabama, Idaho, Maryland, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, and South Dakota.</p>
<p>She links to another great website: &#8220;<a href="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/">The Big Push For Midwives</a>, launched on January 24, is a coordinated campaign to advocate for regulation and licensure of Certified Professional Midwives (<a href="http://narm.org/htb.htm">CPM</a>s) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The website includes a <a href="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/headlines.aspx">page with links to news articles</a> related to midwifery-related legislative efforts, and <a href="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/states.aspx">a map of states</a> [which I've copied below] where licensure is available or where legislation is pending. Licensure is currently available to CPMs in 22 states.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is also a <a href="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/states.aspx" target="_blank">page</a> on The Big Push for Midwives website that lists birth resources for the following states: Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming.&nbsp; (Might be a good place to look if you want a VBAC and are looking for a VBAC supportive provider.)</p>
<p>The relevance of CPM licensure to VBAC moms?&nbsp; More legal options.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_birth#Legal_situation_in_the_United_States" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>No state prosecutes mothers for giving birth outside of a hospital. However, midwives who assist at such births may be prosecuted in some areas.</p>
<p>In the early and mid <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century">1900s</a>, physicians pushed to have midwifery banned throughout the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States">United States</a>. Childbirth became very clinical with the mother generally subdued with leather straps and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethyl_ether">ether</a>. In 37 states it is once again legal to acquire the services of a midwife. Many midwives continue to attend mothers in states where it is illegal, while efforts are underway to change the law.</p>
<p>Practicing as a direct-entry midwife is still (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_of_2006">as of May 2006</a>) illegal under certain circumstances in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington%2C_D.C.">Washington, D.C.</a> and the following states: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alabama">Alabama</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_%28U.S._state%29">Georgia</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii">Hawaii</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois">Illinois</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana">Indiana</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa">Iowa</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky">Kentucky</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland">Maryland</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri">Missouri</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina">North Carolina</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota">South Dakota</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyoming">Wyoming</a>.<sup><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/#_note-11">[12]</a></sup> However, Certified Nurse Midwives can legally practice in these areas.</p>
<p>People wishing to have a midwife-assisted home birth in the United States should always research the applicable laws in their home state.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I know <a href="http://www.vbacfacts.com/hbac" target="_blank">homebirth</a> sounds like a radical thing, but I have heard story after story of women who would have <em>never</em> considered a homebirth until they started looking for a VBAC supportive OB only to find none and then felt trapped, out of options, and scared.&nbsp; And so now these women, who would have been quite happy to birth in a hospital, are hiring midwives, regardless of wether it&#8217;s legal in their state, and having a homebirth VBAC rather than face the alternative, an unwanted, unnecessary repeat cesarean in a &#8216;VBAC ban&#8217; hospital.</p>
<p>I hope this is going to be one of the factors that swings the conventional wisdom back to supporting VBAC because when enough women start birthing at home and that an impact is felt in hospital revenues, hospital administrators and OBs might start paying attention.&nbsp; Unfortunately, by the time that happens, it might be &#8216;to late&#8217; for the hospitals.&nbsp; Enough women would have experienced the joy, peace, privacy, and safety of homebirth to never want a hospital birth again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/states.aspx" target="_blank"><img alt="State-by-State Legislation" src="http://www.thebigpushformidwives.org/images/state.legislation.gif"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vbacfacts.com/2008/03/08/midwifery-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
