Myth: Risk of uterine rupture doesn’t change much after a cesarean
I came across a couple different bits of (mis)information that have really concerned me. In both situations, people give false information regarding how a cesarean affects one’s risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies. First, a women asks on Facebook: what is the risk of rupture is after a cesarean. She receives this reply:
… almost all cases the risk of rupture is less than one percent, even after multiple sections, or special scars such as an inverted T. The risk is roughly double what it is for an unscarred uterus, but considering the tiny numbers it doesn’t really make a difference, especially since the vast majority of ruptures are not catastrophic in nature, something that is not differentiated in study results.
Then later in the day, I came across a comment on a midwife’s website saying that “research shows” the risk of uterine rupture doubles after a cesarean.
How does a prior cesarean impact uterine rupture?
Both of these representations of uterine rupture after a cesarean are incorrect. The risk of a uterine rupture does much more than double after a cesarean.
This is because the risk of uterine rupture in an unscarred uterus is very small in comparison to the risk in a scarred uterus. Prior to having a uterine surgery like a cesarean, the risk of uterine rupture is very small. Per the largest study on unscarred rupture, the risk is 1 in 14,286, or 0.007%. (Zwart, 2009)
Once someone had a cesarean, that risk increases to 1 in 156 or 0.64%. (Zwart, 2009)
The risk of uterine rupture increases 91 times after a cesarean. That’s the truth.
But this is also true: this 91 times greater risk does not mean that the risk of uterine rupture is so large in a scarred mom. It simply means that it’s so very, very small in an unscarred mom.
Plus, that 1 in 156 rate includes labors that were induced and augmented which we know increases the rate of rupture. When we look at studies that break out the risk of rupture among spontaneous labors, the risk decreases to 1 in 240 or 0.4%. (Landon, 2004)
Relative vs. Absolute Risk
So how we communicate these statistics impacts how they will be received.
Do we center how the risks compare – the relative risk – and talk about the 91 times increase?
Or do we focus on how often uterine rupture occurs – the absolute risk – and emphasize the 0.64% risk?
I believe that information is power and the more information parents have, the greater their ability to make informed decisions that feel right for them. So it’s important to talk about both.
Parents should understand how their cesarean impacts their future uterine rupture risk. And they also need to understand that this increased risk is still similar to other obstetrical emergencies even first time parents can experience.
Making an informed decision
The risk of uterine rupture is just one of the many factors that parents must learn about and consider in order to make an informed decision on whether they want a VBAC or a repeat cesarean.
This is why the American College of OB/GYNs describes VBAC as a safe and reasonable option and encourages parents to have access to it.
The truth is, both modes of delivery have small risks associated with them. Parents can only decide which set of risks and benefits are acceptable to them if they actually know the facts. Knowing solely about the risk of rupture does not give them a full picture.
That’s why I created “The Top 5 Completely False Uterine Rupture Myths.” This free report debunks the top uterine rupture myths so you can help your clients bob and weave their way through the misinformation and towards a truly informed decision. Click here to download this free report.
Zwart, J. J., Richters, J. M., Ory, F., de Vries, J., Bloemenkamp, K., & van Roosmalen, J. (2009, July). Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116(8), pp. 1069-1080.
What do you think?
Leave a comment.
What do you think? Leave a comment.
As a nationally recognized consumer advocate and Founder of VBAC Facts®, Jen Kamel helps birth professionals, and cesarean parents, achieve clarity on vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) through her educational courses, training programs, and consulting services. She speaks at conferences across the country, presents Grand Rounds at hospitals, advises advocates seeking legislative change in their state, and serves as a expert witness in legal proceedings. She envisions a time when every pregnant person seeking VBAC has access to unbiased information, respectful providers, and community support, so they can plan the birth of their choosing in the setting they desire.