Many attorneys and judges do not understand the evidence about VBAC. They are part of the larger public who hold three fundamental beliefs.
First, that "once a cesarean, always a cesarean" is based on evidence.
Second, that VBACs are dangerous and repeat cesareans are the safe, controlled, and responsible choice.
Third, medical professionals are responsible for all outcomes - good or bad - surrounding pregnancy care.
Further, physician expert witnesses often simply reiterate these misconceptions, biases, and fears which are deeply planted not only in the hearts and minds of the general public, but also among those who offer pregnancy care.
Jen’s extensive knowledge on the intersection of research, autonomy, and informed consent enables her to express to the court these complex subjects in a clear and simple manner.
Her deep understanding of the medical evidence on VBAC and repeat cesarean as well as the gap between national guidelines and U.S. obstetric practice provides the court with a solid foundation on which to deliberate cases.
For past cases, Jen has consulted with attorneys, compiled exhibits, and completed affidavits for the court.
Are you involved in legal proceedings involving VBAC, cesarean surgery, and/or informed consent during childbirth? Let’s talk about how Jen can support your case.
a highly valuable consultant
Jen Kamel holds deep knowledge of the medical evidence regarding childbirth, cesarean surgery, and vaginal birth after cesarean, as well as the professional and institutional issues that affect obstetric practice and the care that birthing people receive.
Her knowledge and experience enable her to communicate complex facts and concepts in a way that people who are new to the topic can understand.
She is a highly valuable consultant for any legal case related to cesarean surgery, VBAC, and/or informed consent during childbirth.
- Hermine Hayes-Klein, JD